NUR2204 Clinical Reasoning Case Study-Southern Queensland University Australia

Objectives : CO1 Develop and apply knowledge and skills to care for patients experiencing conditions related to National Health Priorities
CO2 Apply understanding of lifespan/developmental, ethnic diversity, and
collaborative patient centred care knowledge to provide nursing care to
diverse individuals from birth to death who are experiencing moderate to
severe acute or episodic health issues
CO3 Apply clinical reasoning, and psycho motor skills interventions to
prioritise and manage the safe, evidence based nursing care for acute
presentations in a variety of simulated clinical settings
CO4 Apply an understanding of pathophysiology and pharmacological and
non-pharmacological approaches to the management of acute health
NUR2204 Clinical Reasoning Case Study-Southern Queensland University Australia

NUR2204 Clinical Reasoning Case Study-Southern Queensland University Australia

Attributes: GA 1 Well-informed individuals with discipline-specific expertise and industry knowledge relevant to their profession or area of study GA 2 Critical, creative, thinkers who can integrate and apply knowledge and relevant skills, including research and digital literacy skills, to analyse and evaluate ideas, concepts, theories and problems, and offer insights, innovative approaches and solutions GA 3 Ethical, engaged professionals and citizens who engage in, non- discriminatory, safe practices and consider the local, global, social, economic, legal and environmental influences on, and impact of, their attitudes and actions GA 4 Employable, enterprising professionals who are confident, self-
directed, know how they learn, and are resourceful, resilient, and adaptable to change

Task detail : Your responses will be assessed according to the clinical content, evidence of critical thinking, adequate standard of academic writing and referencing formatting and quality of sources used.
Marks for academic writing and referencing will be awarded as per marking criteria (attached). Each question on the case study has been allocated with individual marks- please refer to questions in case study

Writing style
This assessment task must:
1.Use the NUR2204 Clinical Reasoning Assignment Case Study
2.Use the template provided on Study Desk under Assessment three tab to answer the questions. Do not include the assessment questions as p[art of your response.
3.You are expected to present your assignment in a scholarly fashion
and academic writing conventions. Answer each qustion in a
paragraph format, writing in complete sentences with NO dot points unless otherwise specified
4.Use Times New Roman size 12 font and 1.5 line spacing
5.Use USQ APA referencing for citing academic literature
6.Use a separate page for references. The reference list is not included
in the word count
7.In-text citations- You must include in-text citations in the body of
your work. Each new point or piece of evidence must be attributed
(via in-texct citation) to the source. In-text references are included
in the word count.

What you need to submit:
You must submit one document that contains the following items:
1.Use the template provided on Study Desk under the Assessment Three: Clinical Reasoning Assignment to write your responses (answers) for each question
2.Questions do not need to be rewritten but clearly identify your
responses (answers)
3.Include a reference list at the end of your responses (answers)
4.Final submission should be submitted via Turnitin

Submission requirements:
This assessment is to be submitted electronically via Assessment 3
Submission link on NUR2204 Study Desk
— It must be submitted in electronic format as a Microsoft Word
document via Turnitin
— The Turnitin process may take up to 24 hours to produce a
report. Therefore, allow adequate time to do this and address any
issues of plagiarism detected by Turnitin before final submission.

Marking and Moderation:
This task will be marked against a marking criteria available on
Study Desk
— All staff who are assessing your work meet to discuss and compare
their judgements before marks or grades are finalised. A rigorous
moderation process is undertaken for this course, hence no
remarking of assessment pieces will be considered
— Final release of grades will normally be within three weeks of
submission. This same time frame applies for any approvals for an
extension of time commencing at the time of submission

• Weight 52kg
• Height 164 cm
• BP 140/85 mmHg
• HR 120 bpm
• Temp 37.70C
• SaO2: 94% (RA)
• Widespread moderately loud wheeze throughout chest
• Clear nasal discharge, slightly watery eyes
• Red throat and slightly enlarged cervical glands

Previous history:
Asthma since childhood- was hospitalised twice as a child with asthma and has not seen a doctor about her asthma for a few years.

• Salbutamol (puffer)
• Oral contraceptive pill

Frances says she does not smoke. She says she has no trouble with exercise and ‘does not often’ wake at night with a cough or wheeze. She stayed at a friend’s house last night, and says the cats there made it much worse. She has used two puffs of her puffer every 2 hours this morning, with the last dose an hour before she arrived. Frances says she thought she had ‘grown out’ of her asthma.

Epidemiology of disease processes (references intentionally

One in every nine Australians have asthma. It is more common in males younger than 14 years, but for people aged 15 years and over, asthma is more common in females.The estimated cost of asthma in Australia in 2015 was $28 billion or $11,740 per person with asthma.
The cost of asthma includes:
• $24.7 billion attributed to disability and premature death
• $1.2 billion on healthcare costs (including medication, hospital and out-of-hospital costs)
• $1.1 billion in loss of productivity
• $72.9 million in loss of wages for carers
• $289.4 million in income support for carers of people with asthma

Asthma has a major impact on individuals, their carers and Australia’s health system. In 2017-2018 there were 38,792 hospitalisations in which asthma was the main diagnosis. Almost half (44%) of these were for children aged younger than 14 years old. Children under 15 were more
likely to be hospitalised with asthma (442 per 100,000 population) than those aged 15 and over (98 per 100,000).

NUR2204 Clinical Reasoning Case Study-Southern Queensland University Australia

NUR2204 Clinical Reasoning Case Study -Southern Queensland University Australia

The National Asthma Council Australia (NAC) was formed in about 1989, partly in response to the high number of asthma-related deaths at that time. As a result of a wide range of initiatives led by the NAC and in collaboration with many other asthma stakeholders, asthma-related deaths have since fallen dramatically. Asthma-related deaths in Australia have now dropped from a peak of 964 in 1989 to 389 in 2018. Yet every asthma death is a tragedy, and people of all ages must continue to take asthma seriously.

Your Task:
Use the Clinical Reasoning Cycle on the following pages to review the nursing priorities in relation to the care of Frances.

NUR2204 Clinical Reasoning Case Study-Southern Queensland University Australia

Excellent Assignment Help

We Aim At:

  • Lowest Price.
  • 100% Uniqueness.
  • Assignment Fastest Delivery.
Call Now : +61 363 877 039